Brilliant!

Ross and co-host Luke Burbank both pointed out that it didn't seem unreasonable to them for an officer to see the ID of someone exercising their open-carry right.

I'm betting the Ross view is the norm among those on the left, but it left me wondering... why then is the Arizona law so out of the question? If it's okay for an officer to demand ID when you're doing NOTHING ILLEGAL, why wouldn't it be okay to establish the true identity of someone who was stopped FOR doing something illegal?

The comments are fun to read too